Alternate title: executive director of Europol Catherine De Bolleshit doesn't know what the hell she's talking about.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
49 points (98.0% liked)
Privacy
32871 readers
1429 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
What do they do with their budgets?
This falls under the category, Ban spoons
governments have to routinely publish this article template over and over again.
requiring us to have the same conversation over and over again.
Pay us to respond or react to this repetitive nonsense!
Europol chief calls for breach of contract?
She drew an analogy between digital encryption and a locked door
And there’s the proof of someone who doesn’t understand what encryption is.
The analogy is closer to not knowing which house to go to.
Once you’ve given someone the address, you can’t stop them telling other people where the house is. And once you’ve given someone the encryption key, you can’t take it back. There is no “master key” that unlocks just for law enforcement.
I wouldn't criticise the metaphor. I would ask why they ask this again and again. What has changed in the previous decade which justify that they don't change what they request.
I wouldn't criticise the analogy because it's easy to miss things. For example, the issue I have when their analogy is that because they can't open the door of one house with a search warrant, they ask for the right to open all the doors, of all the city, anywhen, and this right may be abused. Of course this is far less acceptable so.
"What do you mean mr computer man? I just turned on my chrome book and am watching tiktok while writting this comment. Mr computer man why cant i just unlock everything. Stop using fancy techno bable like TCIP and AES? I just want a sticky note with the master key, i also want the key to narinia and the ability to teleport. Mr techno man, please and thank you. Mr robit give me the master key like in 1995 hackers with the shitty ass mini glasses and the random terminal output "
Some people speak of things they dont comprehend and try to give advice beyond there intelligence.
How would this work without breaking cryptography? The whole point of a good cipher is that the algorithm can be public and widely understood, and all that's needed for it to be secure is for the private key to be private. A cipher that has some backdoor -master key- is by design insecure and no sane person should use it. Security through obscurity doesn't work, trying to keep the algorithm private won't work, someone sooner or later will break it.
It can't work without breaking cryptography. Any system with backdoors in it is fundamentally insecure.
Enough with this shit already! Even the FBI begrudgingly knows better.