this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55507 readers
536 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm spinning up a new seedbox and wanted to know what is everyone using nowadays? I was using deluge via the thick client and rutorrent previously. Are they still king? edit: I should have also mentioned that I plan on running this server headless so I will need to be able to access it via a thin client or a web browser

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I've had a poor experience with Deluge, a bug report completely disregarded years ago as I wasn't able to provide (very technical) details to the developers without some assistance, which they smugly refused to provide (I don't act entitled). I then stumbled upon a post where one of them discussed the reason why they wouldn't add workarounds in the installer as qBittorrent did (firewall exception and a couple of other things I can't recall right now), their reasoning and their wording struck me as strongly ideological, and it made me uneasy. I've had a similar experience with Affinity developers who (again, by way of ideology) refused to add an "interface scale" parameter to their programs, adamant on letting the OS handle the scaling, even though I couldn't change my OS scale because it messed up other programs. Their response was "it's the other program's fault". Very helpful. 👍🏼

Anyway, I was trying to say I don't like Deluge. To answer your question I know it runs via a variety of interfaces so I wouldn't be surprised it's your best bet. I personally use qBittorrent .

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

transmission in docker container on NAS, with dedicated IP that gets forced through VPN on my router

[–] [email protected] 38 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

+1 for qBittorrent. I used to be a Deluge fan, but qBittorrent seems more performant and feature-packed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago

arch-qbittorrentvpn docker container, because it was the easiest to set up on my TrueNAS home server.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

Still qbittorrent. Docker container with web UI makes it trivial.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 14 hours ago

qBittorrent and rtorrent are very popular.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

qBittorrent is probably the most commonly used client. Transmission is another popular option, especially among macOS users, since it has a familiar design and feels more native.

rTorrent is great if you want a CLI app, and ruTorrent offers a web frontend. Another option that you can run on a server is Deluge.

You can control qBittorrent from Android using qBitController or from iOS using qBitControl (you can get it from AltStore after adding the Michael-128 repo). Transdroid supports other clients as well, and it's my personal favorite. If you want to torrent on the Android device itself, check out LibreTorrent. For iOS, use iTorrent (also available on AltStore).

If you already plan on self-hosting, or have root access on your seed box (or some other way of installing applications/deploying Docker containers), I also recommend setting up bitmagnet. It's basically your own torrent indexer and search engine. It can also integrate with your *arr applications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Do you use altstore? Have you tried livecontainer to avoid the 3 app limit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't think that applies when using the EU version and Apple's new sideloading framework. But I don't know, since I only have 1 app sideloaded right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Transmission is my favorite design-wise on macOS but I wish it had i2p support.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

On a headless seedbox Deluge/ruTorrent/Transmission are still reliable, most of the paid seedbox services still default with those.

qBittorrent is hugely popular on the desktop front and has been getting more popular as a headless client now that the web ui has improved, also look into qbittorrent-nox if you don't have a gui to do initial setup with.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

Deluge is always my goto.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

qBittorrent. With a quick UI switch to vuetorrent for the tablet. LXC bound to a bridge thats VPN connected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure why it's not more popular. I use and donate. I've had better performance with this than qbittorrent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Closed source, and their prominent "contains NO Spyware" disclaimer doesn't quite instill confidence. I have also never even heard about it until now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I don't use that client either - But to be fair the dev (Kevin Hearn) has a long history with P2P software e.g. depending how old you are you may have used his WinMX software back in the day. He isn't known for sticking spyware/malware into his software so I sort of trust the software he puts out in that sense. He also maintains other non-torrent P2P file sharing software outside of Tixati.

Of course it would be better if it was open source but he's never been an open source coder AFAIK.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I used transmission for years, but the larger my library got the more issues I had. Currently using Qbit and loving the categories for easier management, especially with the *arr suite.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

I hear people use the search function of QBitTorrent tied to VPN tunnel. Basic, but it works

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

rTorrent with Flood front end.

My only complaint so far is being unable to reach the rTorrent TUI when it's running headless. It otherwise works great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

transmission

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'm a much bigger fan of the deluge thin client, personally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is what I used in the past but I had issues with the Deluge thin client when using a Deluge docker image. Did you experience the same thing as well?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nope! My deluge server is hosted in a docker network with gluetun, and I access it from both thin clients and the web interface.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Mind me asking which docker image you are using? I was never able to get the thin client to work through docker

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Deluge on desktop, Flud on mobile. 😃

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Flud looks proprietary and has ads.

Libretorrent works just as well and is open source.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago