this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024

27 points (93.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26890 readers

1945 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What effect would a stochastic metronome have on its listener? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

By stochastic, I mean it randomly ticks on only one arbitrary beat per measure

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

The pattern-seeking brain would be driven crazy trying to predict when the next tick is going to happen, as this pattern is not easy to analyze without tools. Experienced musicians could figure out that the shortest time between beats is half the second-shortest, and perhaps figure it out from there.

Anyway, you could make a website that simulates this or generate a long YouTube video, send a link to unsuspecting people and see what they think. If you want to be extra sneaky, use rain sound as background and "close-up" recordings of single drops for the beats. If you can't code, make sound files of all the different possible measures in Audacity and use a media player with seamless playback and naïve shuffle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well, something like this is actually quite popular in modular synthesizers community. They have one type of modules called "Clock generators" which generate gate/trigger signals for given BPM (Like 1/4 or 1/8 or 1/16 rhythmic pulses for 120 BPM for example) and another type of modules called "Bernoulli gates", which basically allow to specify probability of input signal going to the output. Those beat-skipping metronomes with configured probabilities are then used to trigger notes or samples or whatever. Also, this is modular where you can modulate almost everything, including BPM itself, but that's a different story... Stochastic music approaches like this are often called "alleatoric music".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

aleatoric

Thanks for the new word today :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is similar to some popular exercises for improving your internal pulse. E.g. having the metronome drop out for a number of bars while you're playing.

My prediction:

On its own, it would be hard to derive the underlying pulse. Even a trained musician would take a little while (my guess is 4+ measures). In the context of a song it would probably have little to no effect.

I could probably test this if anyone's interested

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am. Let us know your findings if you end up testing it and if you have a good way of people testing it out for themselves, that would be cool.

I feel like its something I should be able to code out quick but for some reason I'm drawing a blank

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'll code this up today and send you a link

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Here's a super rough demo: https://metronope.bickio.me/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I agree with you.

I'd be curious if a purely random choice of beat would actually be easier than if there was a skewed bias.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Mocked up a super rough example to try this: https://metronope.bickio.me/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'd just ignore it and play by pulse. You learn to ignore that stuff - out of time clapping, background noises etc.