this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
13 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
6348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Inconsistencies in phone call records; a confusing time stamp on a Google search to learn how long it would take for a person to die in the cold; health data that showed a person descending a stairway — or maybe in a car.

While some forensic work is well established, such as DNA evidence, other technologies aren’t quite as grounded, as the Read trial showed. In particular, the field of digital forensics continues to evolve, shaped by court challenges and advancing technology. So, questions around the validity of that data have become the latest frontier in what legal observers call the “battle of experts”: dueling interpretations of an unsettled science.

And, with enough legal prowess — and financial resources — defendants can line up parades of experts to try to undermine a prosecution witness’s interpretation of forensic data, from the timing of a Google search to the movement of a human body.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240814121648/https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/08/12/metro/karen-read-digital-forensics/

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here