The moment you start charging for access to your hardware you have to start signing SLAs, have documented backups available, have a support team on hand, it's just a nightmare. Would not recommend.
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
53 points (92.1% liked)
Selfhosted
40006 readers
874 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
OP might not be looking to make a full paid service considering he's just doing this for friends and relatives.
I get the sentiment though. I run a Jellyfin server that I share with a few friends and some of them have flat out told me that I should start charging for it. I refused because getting paid for it just sets up an expectation that it will be reliable and have all the stuff that they want. Personally, I don't want that kind of pressure. I want to be able to tweak the server and install new things / updates without worrying about uptime.
I tell my friends that my SLA for my media server is Shit's Likely Available just so they understand that I give it out of generosity and don't want anything in return. The bonus is that keeping brutally honest upfront likely means less risk of me ruining someone's Friday movie night.
Was not looking to make a paid service, was just trying to help my dad out and my friend learn without them paying a VPS company.
i understand they don't want to pay, but would $12.00 for a full year be cheap enough to consider? ovh has a new customer deal going for 2gb ram/20gb storage vps. $0.97 a month for the first year, and you can add up to ten of those to a single new account.
This is opening a can of worms. Are you going to be their support person? What if one person destroys the environment and someone elses work?
Exactly, I can’t let two users into the same VM server as administrators, like you said, they could manipulate other user’s resources. The front end to online VPS sites kinda give each user a cordoned off sandbox of resources to play in. Maybe if I gave each their own virtualized proxmox instance they could VPN into?
You might want to try Openstack. It is set up for running a multi-tenant cloud.
Heard of this. Need to look into devstack. Thank you for putting it back on my radar
This is the way.
It can be done. It's not worth the work involved. You could firewall off the two proxmox instances from each other and your own network. Then allow VPN access into the environment. You'll have to allow the machines access to the Internet to get software updates. The moment you do that you're opening the door to them making an outbound tunnel to make services publicly accessible. Then you've got every bot on the internet scanning your services for vulnerabilities/exploits.
Access to the outside world is where I start to not know what to do. If this was just locally run, I know how it would try and attack it, but the fact they they have to have access to the internet, that’s a hurdle I do not know how to get over.
I mean you could. Shell accounts did this back in the day but yes users could still abuse the system.
I know you're trying to go full self service but that's likely overkill and given your limited resources you should maintain some control.
How about setting up resource pools in proxmox? You can permission accounts so that your dad and your friend only have access to manage the vms in their resource pool. You would need to create the vms/containers for them and assign to the pool but that would be the extent of your involvement. But that would allow you to maintain a certain level of control over your environment.
To be clear you'd just be creating the vm. They could do the actual os installs and whatnot provided you permission the pool properly.
I would just set up a separate VM for each of them and let them SSH/VNC in. Don't think they'll be doing anything that requires them to destroy and recreate their Virtual Machines constantly right?
Give them a user account and let them ssh in.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| SSH | Secure Shell for remote terminal access |
| VNC | Virtual Network Computing for remote desktop access |
| VPN | Virtual Private Network |
| VPS | Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting) |
4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.
[Thread #145 for this sub, first seen 18th Sep 2023, 11:55] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]