this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
313 points (88.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35493 readers
280 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago (18 children)

You chose to buy it at that price. What does it matter what the original price was or how much the seller made? You thought the price was fair, had the choice to not buy it or buy it somewhere else.

This isn't like scalpers buying up items, creating artificial scarcity and driving up prices for profit. This is just plain old capitalism.

Presumably the price also included shipping and handling fees, since you bought it online. So in the end the seller probably made just a couple of quid, he deserves to get paid for what he does no?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It is tacky to leave the sticker on there with the lower price, but you are the one who paid 12£. How does it matter what they paid? If they search for books to resell at a profit, that's time spent, risk taken, and money earned.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It always sucks to know you paid more than the seller did - but that just means Oxfam undervalued the book.

Having worked in one, charity shops tend to have a habit of either really undervaluing or overvaluing their donated goods - cause the people who actually set the prices mostly just guess based on looks and nothing more. Only if an item looks expensive will they do any research, and even then never really enough.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Our local shop has a database of values.

Granted, it's not perfect, but I would assume since they have one it's a publicly traded commodity (that is someone maintains a DB and sells it to such organizations).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

With the rise of ebay thrift resalers, I feel like all the charity/thrift stores around me price rather aggressively.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ok, don't buy it online then go get it from the thrift store yourself. Oh that takes valuable time and effort? Guess that's why it was marked up, peoples' time is worth money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So you're annoyed that someone (who took the time to go to a charity shop, list the book online, and ship it to you) charged you the RRP for the book, that you didn't have to buy from them?

I hope you have the same kind of energy for when mega-corporations charge anything from tens to thousands of pounds for products that often cost single pounds or even pennies to manufacture (due to underpaying for labour and materials that were in turn manufactured by underpaid labour as well), and the snowballing impact they have on the rest of the economy (by pricing out smaller companies, monopolising industries, avoiding tax, and so on).

The person you bought this from likely works for themsleves, trolling charity shops all day for bargains, and almost certainly pays tax on their income. I'm as anti-capitalist as they get, but even I can't take issue with this. If they had charged you more than the RRP, sure, that'd pushing it, but if you didn't want to pay full price, you should have spent your own time looking for the bargain. ¯\(ツ)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Rofl. Imagine being mildly infuriated that someone marked up a bargain bin purchase by $10 to cover their time and effort to make it available to you to buy from the comfort of your home.

Why don't you spend your own day rummaging through thrift stores for it next time?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We shit on 'upselling' all the time. If you cleaned those pages, pressed them back and touched up the spine of the book, sure. But I'd be annoyed too if there was a 500% markup on a resale of used material

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You see 500% markup.

I see 10 pounds for the time and effort to shop around for bargains, then storing your haul, list the items online, and the cost of the other dozens of books that never sell, and then time and effort to package and ship, and whatever customer service along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

You should definitely spend time trawling through Oxfam shops for books, if this annoys you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

listen, you paid what you thought it was worth to you that's how retail works they buy product, then sell them at a markup you buy products from them only if you think it's worth the price they're asking you get the product, they get the money

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think about the price, It's about reselling something you got at a charity.

Plenty of stores sell cheap, used stuff that everyone can fit in their budgets. More and more of these resellers are picking the stores clean, leaving a lot less available for those who "need" it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

charity shops aren't for those who "need" the products, their sole purpose is to generate funds for the charity. have you lost your mind?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

A used book for 12£ is maybe 8€ more than I normally spent on used books.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Putting the £ sign after the value is in itself mildly infuriating.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mildly?

I'm going to assume they're not British...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they just typed it out how they would say it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

At least they didn't write 1£99

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most book sellers on the Internet roam around, buy used books, cut them to make them look new and then sell it as new.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Cut them? What does that man?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

They take a bit off the edges, which, when done right, can make them look new at a first glance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Using a paper cutter, aligning the worn pages along the outside edge of the book into a nice looking rectangle

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Bought where on the internet? I think that context is quite relevant tbh.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Costs money and time to package and ship stuff. They should've at least removed the sticker though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Takes time and money to do that as well though, and I kinda feel like op would not have appreciated that markup

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›