this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
200 points (96.3% liked)

Android

27896 readers
261 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Any way to turn that off? Bluetooth is very insecure.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago

If you read the article they say there's a toggle to enable/disable auto Bluetooth on.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (6 children)

In what ways is having bluetooth on but not doing anything insecure?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean it was not too long ago there was a bug which could lead to an unauthenticated RCE against Bluetooth on Android.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20345

So yea, reducing surface area of attack when a feature is not needed is kinda important.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

When we do defcon, Bluetooth is one of the easiest protocols to take control of. It's funny. It's also easy to spoof, easy to mess with, and generally very insecure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

was at 37c3 and people were constantly spamming BLE pairing requests lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm curious, what about Bluetooth makes it insecure? Is it that vendors create insecure implementations, like Android, or is it a human issue like connecting to things by default? I recall the Bluetooth spec being unbelievably complex and verbose, which obviously increases risk and makes it harder to audit, but it doesn't get many updates, and I don't recall seeing many issues with the spec itself. I mean it's not like it's fixing a CVE every quarter like with netty packages.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

It’s too complicated. Bluetooth is complicated. It tries to do way too much, and not even the experts can implement it in a consistent fashion because different Bluetooth stacks are forced to make assumptions where the specification is unclear.

When you have a large, complex, and poorly designed specification, you’re going to get bugs. The main limiting factor has been the short range of Bluetooth preventing widespread exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Its more complex than I can talk about here in any kind of depth, but it comes down to it being a very old protocol. It has known security issues that are just not fixed as it would break backwards compatibility with a lot of devices. So the same issues that were chosen to not be fixed are still out there. You can, with very little effort, take control of just about any Bluetooth device(or partial). Or at least knock it out if commission.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

People lock their door when lock picks and axes exist. Making criminals work harder to access your belongings is pretty important in a lot of aspects.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I mean, just look at what happened over in ios land. Every time there is a new security issue or denial of service attack on their bluetooth stack, apple has to scramble to fix it because bluetooth is always on in their devices. Android at least has some respite by turning off bluetooth, especially on old devices that no longer receiving security updates.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Bluetooth has one of the largest network stacks. It's bigger than Wifi. This means some parts of the stack probably aren't tested and may have bugs or vulnerabilities. It has duplicate functionality in it. This opens up the possibility that flaws in how different parts interact could lead to vulnerabilities or exploits.

A number of years ago some security researchers did an analysis of the Windows and Linux stacks. They found multiple exploitable vulnerabilities in both stacks. They called their attack blue borne, but it was really a series of attacks that could be used depending on which OS you wanted to target. Some what ironically, Linux was more vulnerable because the Linux kernel implemented more of the protocol than Windows.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What? The kernel only implements HCI - a way to talk to hardware

The Bluetooth stack and its protocols are implemented in BlueZ or on Android in Gabeldorsche

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeeeaaah, that makes more sense. 😅 That would be a giant gaping vulnerability if everything was in kernel space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago

I'm so fucking sick of it. I just want to go back to old Android and Windows. Fuck both these bloated corps who keep inching away at shit they know goddamn well they're doing. Seriously. Leave my shit alone. Let me root it and customize and fuck it up as I please. Leave me the fuck alone. /rant

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So that the phones can ping each other in order to find lost phones

[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

That's their excuse.

Better be an opt-in feature instead of an opt-out, because I'm tired of needing to turn off new 'features' I don't need that are said to be for something that sounds kind of reasonable but ends up being because they want to track more things and have more control over you.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ya I don't like the idea either. But what really grinds my gears is that misleading headline that makes it sounds like they are doing it suddenly with no apparent reasons.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I prefer neutral headlines that don't promote what is likely to be a lie without the context of the article.

They say it is for finding lost phones, but I don't really believe that is the actual reason. They are probably doing some kind of tracking that uses bluetooth and too many people are turning it off for their preferences.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let the reader be the judge. You can be neutral without hiding information. How about "Android 15 can turn Bluetooth on automatically and Google says it's for finding lost devices"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you read the article, it does have a toggle to enable or disable the feature

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If the default setting is on, then it is opt-out.

It wouldn't be either without the toggle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Don't complain too much about it. They can already do that part, really. I'm just happy the find my device network is finally about to go live do I can have non apple air tag like things that will actually work really well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ha jokes on them I always keep it off. Wired headphones all the way baby

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Doing the dishes while listening to podcasts with low battery makes me wish my wireless earphones didn't break so soon. The amount of times I took my phone out, put it on a table and walked away to tow it off the table is staggering. Or forgetting to turn down the amplifier before unplugging just to get blasted with static noise isn't something I miss.

Not having to bother with reconnecting bluetooth headphones and instead plugging in a cable is great tho, so I understand everyone who still likes their wired headphones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Google is taking a page from Apple, iOS does exactly that kind of shit. It's annoying.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

And probably for the same reason. Google is rolling out an update to their device tracking network and if it's anything like Apple's, it relies on as many phones as possible having blue tooth enabled.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The UI strings make it pretty clear this is an option the user can choose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is informative, but how often does the average person read this kind of information? Especially when they are set on doing something simple, such as turning off Bluetooth. What if you never use the settings menu, and only turn it off from the notification drawer? They never see that information. Not to mention that it’s such a small option (even though it’s a big paragraph) that they make it seem like they don’t want the user to disable it completely.

What they should do, is when the user disables Bluetooth the first time (anywhere on the phone), a pop up is at least shown to instruct the user that it is still scanning in the background. That way the user is informed. OR, hear me out, have background scanning disabled by default and prompt the user to enable it the first time they disable Bluetooth.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Honestly this is probably for the average user... Because Google doesn't want to receive calls that XYZ (that uses Bluetooth) is broken from those that are tech illiterate in the general public and accidentally turned Bluetooth off.

My grandpa as an example would also not read your pop-up.

The general public is not concerned with disabling Bluetooth for more than a power saving or troubleshooting step... And even then, it's going to be an accident more than a choice for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think the primary motivation for this change is to keep bluetooth active on significant portion of android users so google's upcoming "find my" network can take off. They don't want people to permanently turn off bluetooth from the drawer because there is a chance that they forgot about it and won't turn it on again, which is bad for their upcoming network. Adding popups to inform the users will increase the chance of users deciding to permanently deactivating bluetooth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My April fools prank ~~you~~ on my friends was a fake news article. It would've worked if any of them actually read past the headline.

In the same regards, it's a toggle if you want it to come back automatically. You can still turn off Bluetooth and leave it off. The feature is there so you don't turn off Bluetooth and lose your device & the only way to track it

Edit: fixed typo

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably Google wants to create a new surveillance web using Bluetooth LTE on devices like Apple did with its AirTags

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did you even read the article? That's literally what they're planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

It will be a really sad day when they kill Termux and Tasker. At the same time, maybe it will be the push for people smarter than me to write a proper competitive OS that we can flash.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Latest MIUI 14 (Android 13) is already doing this shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

yeah i think this is a pretty good option since a lot of people turn off bluetooth and then wonder why their hearing devices or smart gadgets don't work. it's obviously just an option not mandatory.

load more comments
view more: next ›