this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39980 readers
780 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

I'm playing around with a VPS and have successfully connected a NFS share of my local NAS via OpenVPN. At Home I don't have a connection with a static IP address so once per night the the VPN needs to reconnect, this take about 2 minutes. Is it possible to buffer the NFS mount, so it doesn't produce any read / write errors? I read about NFS caching, but I think this is only meant for periods way smaller than a Minute. Does any one of you got experience with such a setup?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that is a good idea. NFS is more designed for LAN than for WAN.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would be a good alternative? SSHFS?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It depends on what you want to do with it. WebDAV might be an idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're quite bold - I like it ;-) in all honesty, is your requirement mounting an NFS share? As indicated by @chris it really is designed for the local network.
How about using something more suited like a WebDAV share/mount?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd recommend Wireguard over OpenVPN, it's much faster and just generally more efficient. Notably, it also handles network changes better, and reconnects in seconds rather than minutes. It seems like it would be a much better fit for your use case.