With a fine that small, it’s just the price of doing business.
(Weird calling what Apple does “business,” since these anticompetitive practices are metaphorically closer to pollution than legitimate commerce.)
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
161 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
59390 readers
2560 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Well, yes and no. Paying that fine once would just be a cost of doing business, but now that the precedent has been set if they continue to do it they’ll continue to get fined in that order. Those fines won’t need court cases, so they’ll need to be paid quickly and in full. Sure, the fine they received didn’t really hurt them but it will change their behaviour. It will also prevent others from engaging in the same behaviour.
I don’t think the EU wants to bankrupt companies like Apple - it’s not in the collective best interest. They need to guide behaviour by setting up punishments that are deterring but not destructive. I think €500m fits that pretty well - it’s akin to giving a child a timeout while their friends play or a smack on the back of the hand. It’s doing what it’s intended to do.
If they want it to have an effect it should be $500 million every 3 months until it changes.
Every month, they are a big company, but I think they can be bothered to notice something like the EU charging them $500m in that time.
To Ponzi schemes and selling snake oil. Only their customers won't complain and sue them, because it's still sometimes nice to use, and it's a real functioning thing, and premium costs are not deceit, and nobody wants to admit they've been fooled, and they are often not qualified to understand it.
Weren't Microsoft got fined similar amount (or was it higher?) for Internet Explorer browser monopoly back then?
Yes. And they were allowed to pay that fine in the form of free copies of Windows to schools. Our justice system at work, people! 😔