this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
183 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
136 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There's actual burn in, but there's also perceived burn in (I made the term up) which this wouldn't fix.

If you leave the TV on for hundreds of hours playing 4:3 TV for example with black bars on each side, those bars aren't emitting light. Meanwhile the content that is shown is slowly degrading those OLEDs.

Eventually the content OLEDs are dimmer than the black bar OLEDs and you have "burn in" with the bars visible.

So it could still be a problem for things like static displays where there isn't always moving content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Would it not be "additive burn-in" and "subtractive burn-in" or something then? Or "differential burn-in?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That makes sense ya