this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32426 readers
922 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I watched oppenheimer in emacs, u watched it in imax, we are not the same

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An extremely extensible text editor, there's jokes that it can do literally anything, you can play music, watch video, etc.

It's often at war with the cult of vi and the church of emacs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should really convert to helixism, the latest messianic update to the cult of vi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm a vim and emacs user for some decades already. I had this urge one day to try and work with helix. It kind of misses some things such as file manager or editorconfig support. Nine months later I'm still using helix. It still misses these things, but I really started to like how I don't need any plugins to work with it and I need about five lines of configuration to have a usable editor. Probably going to continue using it.

And it is written in Rust, which is my main language and I can just jump in to the editor source and fix things if needed.

I miss magit and org from emacs a lot though. Every time I need to write an article, I do it in emacs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's probably this, for all of you whou didn't know Helix before, like me: https://helix-editor.com/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget us nanoites. The clearly superior text editor

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nanoers just never figured out how to :wq

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

:x? Real Programmers use ZZ.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what if you wanted to write even if there weren't changes?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then you use :wq