Technology

59123 readers

2308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

232

Let’s not make the same mistakes with AI that we made with social media (www.technologyreview.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From the article: "In particular, five fundamental attributes of social media have harmed society. AI also has those attributes. Note that they are not intrinsically evil. They are all double-edged swords, with the potential to do either good or ill. The danger comes from who wields the sword, and in what direction it is swung. This has been true for social media, and it will similarly hold true for AI. In both cases, the solution lies in limits on the technology’s use."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I saw an IBM commercial that depicted an AI personal assistant informing a user that their credit card had been used for a fraudulent charge. It asked the user if a particular charge was legit and they said no. Then the AI informed the user that the transaction had been canceled and a new card had been issued.

I have a couple problems with this. First, what if the AI was hallucinating parts of this interaction? Secondly, at some point the user's AI will be interfacing with the bank's AI, then we will effectively be subservient to a bunch of algorithms automatically running the world and we will basically be children with our AI parents taking care of us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

then we will effectively be subservient to a bunch of algorithms automatically running the world and we will basically be children with our AI parents taking care of us.

That's the plan.

Shareholders think they'll be excluded because they can call and reach a human.

But it will soon be impossible to be a shareholder over every AI that could possibly fuck you. And we will undoubtedly turn over things to AI that we should have kept control of, to the point of being unable to even help our poor shareholders.

I expect that everyone will need at least a little prompt engineering in their life before this mess is under control.

So there's that to look forward to.

The good news is AI are just computers wearing fancy pants and can, and will, be unplugged when we learn - the hard way - what uses AI is no good for. I'm sure that'll be big "who could possibly have seen this coming?!" news, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

(I'm a shareholder and I don't think this.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Not to mention how voice assistants can just mishear you. Told google once to put dental floss on my shopping list and it said "got it, I added applesauce." Good try I guess. Pretty trivial this time, but they expect me to trust that for tasks with financial stakes?