this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
107 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
3364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
107
Self-Destructing Chips: Researchers Unveil Techniques to Thwart Sophisticated Cyberattacks (www.techradar.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Researchers presented new techniques to fight sophisticated hacking at a tech conference. Here are the highlights:

Self-destruct chips:

  • A team from Vermont and Marvell created chips with unique fingerprints that can destroy themselves (through increased voltage) if tampered with. This prevents both counterfeiting and unauthorized access to information.
  • Probe detection: Columbia and Intel researchers developed a circuit that detects probes attached to a circuit board, preventing hackers from gaining physical control of a system.
  • Signal Obscuring: Researchers from Texas and Intel created a method to hide a chip's power and electromagnetic signals, making it harder for attackers to steal information.

These innovations could improve chip security and save businesses billions from chip counterfeiting.

Comments

NGL. After I saw "Self-destruct chips", I was just overwhelmed by Mission Impossible theme song.

https://youtu.be/PeKW0stTThk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

sounds like it closes a data theft vector but opens one hell of a ~~ddos~~ DoS vector in its place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Still, having this option can't be a bad thing. Ultimately it's an engineer (or PM I suppose) that decides to use this chip based on the product requirements.

Sometimes you want to fail closed, or purposefully fail catastrophically if some constraints aren't met.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

load more comments (1 replies)