this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
1507 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
59374 readers
3169 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Requiring written opt out for technology that otherwise is internet connected should be considered undue burden. It should also be considered a choice the company made to reduce the number of people opting out.
The reason why people are upset is because any update in terms of use that a user doesn't agree with should be presumptively ineffective, because the user has property rights to use the thing they purchased.
This absurd pop-up reached out of the ether, disabled all of our TVs with no warning, and held the TV hostage until you clicked "Agree." "Agree" itself is falsely labeled because there is literally no other option. Even following the absurdly cumbersome opt-out process, you still have to click "agree" to use your own property. It's subtle but deeply dystopian.
People are probably making a stink because Roku is pushing out these messages to all their TVs, and people don't typically read mile-long EULAs. When's the last time you read one?