this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1403 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2809 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1403
Google gets its way, bakes a user-tracking ad platform directly into Chrome (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
363 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally thought they were implying that China could be a privacy concern, as you don't have a single clue what happens with your data there. There's zero reason to assume anything bad especially with a simple statement like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally thought they were implying that China could be a privacy concern

...and this is a good thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you leave out the rest of what I said sure? I don't actually know what you're asking.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I left it out because its not important. You said they didn't say anything bad and then said you thought they were saying it compromises your privacy. Maybe you don't care about privacy but I think most people would consider invading your privacy very much "a bad thing".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This argument was never about invading privacy not being a bad thing? It was about the racism and such comment the other commenter made?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My dude, do you have amnesia?

I'd like to point out that they said nothing about it being a bad thing and that all they did was say it was Chinese-owned, hence making your comment a pointless attack of nonsense.

They were very clearly implying that being Chinese-owned is a bad thing (because of the privacy implications), which is the opposite of what you said.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to stop replying now because this is going nowhere, but no that is not what I said and I really don't know what to tell you. You're missing key things here about the intention and tone of my comment and the one I replied to.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe you'd like to attempt again to explain what you meant? Because you have already confirmed my understanding was correct.