Programmer Humor

19564 readers

1077 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

278

Old xkcd, I can't see it ever not being relevant (xkcd.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (10 children)

I am not a programmer, but on 2 occasions I was able to improperly fix (1 argument in 1 line stuff) very small bugs without really understanding how. I've also made a number converter (dec-bin-hex) at least twice. I know those aren't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice twice.

I'd say there's an issue here with language design having major tradeoffs, but maybe it's just a paradox*? Though I have found a language I like (even though I'm not learning it because other issues), so I know it's not impossible at least.

*= Like the people who could make something with less tradeoffs don't have the need/desire to do that, they just use the existing stuff. Though that is much more fitting for visual programming.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (9 children)

it's weird that it happened twice

Everyone who dabbles in programming eventually learns :q. Not everyone learns :wq.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I learned :q! first!

load more comments (8 replies)