this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
301 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
2299 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
301
US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program (interestingengineering.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would also work.

The only thing that won't work for space is the thing we're doing now:

  • Maintaining a vice-like government control
  • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I disagree privitizing space will do absolutly nothing but lead to balooned costs and stagnation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

We can't have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it ... and callling it innovation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I'm sorry... this is not true lol. You know what SpaceX is up to, right? At the least, but there are tons of interesting and innovative companies. I mean hell look at Stoke Space