this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
221 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
59123 readers
2310 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't constant maintenance one of these 'jobs' things that everyone wants and are good for the economy?
A specialized highrise landscaper could be a nice paying job too.
We need the world to be a better place more than we need the economy to have maximum efficiency.
I agree.
You're both ignoring the full costs of maintenance.
And by costs, I mean more than dollars.
What's the energy cost of the folks who maintain these things? The materiel and it's energy cost? Tools/equipment that wouldn't otherwise be required?
It's surprisingly far more complex than just reduced AC expenditure. Are we sure that all the inputs over the life cycle have been accounted for?
It's rare for a new system (of any type, in any industry) to actually reduce costs (again, all costs, not just money), let alone to the degree they're purported. Typically we see incremental improvements, and usually a loss in some unpredicted way.
Good analysis is difficult, even for simple systems.
Hopefully these ideas pan out, my suspicion is they're effective for a narrow set of conditions.
Also, not a new idea at all.