this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
822 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3794 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet.
  • Musk's personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
  • Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 179 points 9 months ago (26 children)

Holy shit this dude fucking lives on his plane. Like I feel guilty about the 2-3x per year I fly to see family but this fucker has flown that far already in the past week. Why? Does he not know how to do a video call?

[–] [email protected] 151 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Ugh, I feel the same. I know the top 1% of the world or whatever emits tons and tons more CO2 per year than the other 99%, but I didn't know it was this bad. That plane is flying multiple times per day. Sure Musk is probably not in it all the time, but that doesn't matter.

Private jets should be banned all together, let's see how quickly they suddenly find out the internet exists.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (7 children)

All air travel should have fuel and emissions tax. Normalize them to commercial airliners. That'll incentivize larger, more efficient plane designs. It'll also punish private jets. Also charge a fee for any planes not at least X% full. Also give discounts and waive fees for planes over X size that service under-served airports.

A bunch of regulations like this should make private planes prohibitively expensive, like 10-20x their current cost. But that's a lot of legislation that huge corporations and billionaires would oppose.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Planes are already pretty fuel efficient per passenger. And larger planes are unlikely, because this would mean all runways they want to use must be extended so the can start and land there.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Commercial planes with high occupancy got somewhat efficient (until you compare to other modes of transportation), but private jets with 1 ego on board are incredibly fuel inefficient.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s a very big ego though, so of course it needs a lot of fuel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

how much fuel would it take to burn the ego to the ground?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Carbon emissions per km:-

  • Domestic flight: 240 g

  • Eurostar (train): 4 g

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-footprint-travel-mode

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's domestic flights in the UK which are stupidly short. Short and long haul flights are at 150g which is already less than ICE cars at ~170 and not far above the average bus at 100g. Though obviously no where near electrified rail.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Planes are already pretty fuel efficient per passenger

Eh.... They're similar to cars for a similar distance. But, that still means gobs of CO2 emitted if you're traveling from NY to LA, which would be a massive trip in a car.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)