169
I'm looking for a TOS-breaking telegram client that strips out all the premium shit
(lemmy.kde.social)
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
169 points (96.7% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54609 readers
836 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bruh, look at the magazine before commenting.
If you aren't going to offer anything constructive in your comment, why don't you buy the guy the premium upgrade yourself?
Oh no, the bad man told me to pay for the privacy service I use instead of freeloading and stealing from them.
It's one thing to steal shit because it's unavailable. I think it's another to steal from a company offering reasonable privacy services competing against Whatsapp. And then you'll all bitch when it's only Facebook left. Signal is certainly circling the drain.
How about using a messenger that isn't beholden to the good graces of "a company?" XMPP has been around for ages. Setup a server and use it.
Good luck getting anyone to use it.
Well, if you are to be believed, eventually they won't have any choice once the other shitty dominoes fall.
Yup. And the current status quo will continue. Folks will use WhatsApp, iOS, RCS.
Support companies like signal and telegram.
Nope, fuck companies like telegram. Just another ghoul trying to profit off the backs of open source developers. Signal is owned by a non-profit, so not sure what kind of "support" you are speaking of, but the desktop app is electron trash, so it's right out for me.
Also, one of those things is not like the others. RCS is a 3GPP standard, the infrastructure to run already being paid for by my wireless bill. I would prefer people use it to talk to me.
Doesn't it depend exclusively on Google?
Carriers can setup their own infrastructure if they wish, it's just that many are content to let Google deal with it. This isn't RCS's (or Google's, for that matter) fault.