this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
550 points (97.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53948 readers
562 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mp3s from YT are garbage quality, it's double transcoding from YT's already low quality input.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. If you’re gonna be downloading music from youtube, might as well just torrent flac or at least 320kbps quality instead.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Torrents mostly have pop music ime.

(Popular music trendy, ie Brittany Spears, Eminem, etc.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is the most 2001 comment I've read this week.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

😂 torrents and Usenet have everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any good spots for oz music? Hiphop...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure, don’t listen to it sorry. Pirate bay?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Um, you need a hookup?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can download audio from YouTube as 160kbps opus files, which aren't lossless sure but it's the highest quality you can get from YouTube if alternate means aren't an option.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it's still double encoded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well if you save the opus or aac it's only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hq is equivalent to 320kbps, noticably better than YT quality

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

For mp3 sure, but for opus standards 160kbps is great. I read that 128kbps is generally considered the most you need but 160kbps smooths over any artifacts, assuming the source file doesn't have them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't noticed any quality issues and I only listen to mp3s from youtube

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can download relatively good sounding audio from YouTube but you need to be using the right format in YouTube-DL, which not all downloaders do

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

What about NewPipe?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you probably don't know any better because the vast majority of YT uploads are terrible quality. If you have anywhere near decent headphones/earbuds you can hear the difference immediately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well I've used spotify with and without headphones on popular phones, I can't tell the difference from youtube. I usually download the music directly from the original uploader.