Technology

59390 readers

2539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

430

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

396 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're creating a film that wasn't there before though? Recording is creation, I don't know what you think cameras do or how video is made 🙄

Recording is creation too and it can all be IP infringing at any stage, it's all completely irrelevant how it was made in 99% of cases (exception being reverse engineering)

Brain is absolutely just a computer lol. I look at images - I remember images, I'm influenced by images. Is that fair use? If so - so is AI, because that's all it does.

laughed out of court

Like the lawsuit against Stable Diffusion & Midjourney? You know, the class action one that was dismissed precisely because the end work (output) was non-infringing, and training itself (and by extension, the tech) was not an infringement?

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/judge-pares-down-artists-ai-copyright-lawsuit-against-midjourney-stability-ai-2023-10-30/

Educate yourself.

Read up on the Sony vs United Studios too if you want to get in intro on law stuff. Start with Wikipedia. Then watch as this court case against OpenAI unfolds like I said it will.

You keep banging on about the same few points that are all incorrect, proven time and time again, I have better things to do than to respond to this any further.

I've been studying

I guess you need to study it some more then, you don't even know the basics.

I swear you reddit refugee armchair experts need to go back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Recording is creation

Not according to the law. And if you disagree, find me the law that defines recording as creation.

Like the lawsuit against Stable Diffusion & Midjourney? You know, the class action one that was dismissed precisely because the end work (output) was non-infringing, and training itself (and by extension, the tech) was not an infringement?

One of many. One getting dismissed does not equal all getting dismissed.

Sony vs United Studios

Irrelevant to this subject. Original content was not at issue.

I swear you reddit refugee armchair experts need to go back.

This was literally directly connected to my own business for 15 years. One I ran legally. Because I made sure to study copyright and trademark law as much as possible so my company wouldn't ever violate it.

And since I'm a 'refugee armchair expert,' from where did you get your law degree? Feel free to answer unless you want to just insult me again.