Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54462 readers

279 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

389

Santa came late last year, but hard (lemmy.wtf)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

NSFW 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Super jealous. Half for storage and half for backup or just going all storage?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

The idea is going for raid5 so that should be around 100TB of storage, minus the OS and apps, etcs. But easily 80TB+ net storage.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I use a 1tb ssd for the os/apps with my raid5 strictly for storage. Kinda nice if the os needs to be reinstalled or I want to migrate the raid cluster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

but that means you need to give up a bay slot for the system sdd, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

In my case, I use a PCI card with an m.2 slot for my OS drive. I lose a PCI slot, but I already had a few to spare.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

That would probably depend on case, motherboard, and which (if any) pcie slots are occupied.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

With that amount of storage I highly recommend RAID6.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd do a pool with 2x vdevs, each with three drives in raidz1

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's also a good option but I wouldn't with 6 drivers personally. I have a 12 bay array with two pools of 6 each running raidz2. I've run raid 5 for a long time but have had one drive fail many times and always have mini heart attacks while I wait for the new drive to come in and the rebuild process to happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I do this for expansion. I can expand the pool three drives at a time instead of 6. But, I set it up knowing the risk with a single parity drive...and I've acounted for that with backups. 👍