Technology

59421 readers

2842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1240

"Did you realize that we live in a reality where SciHub is illegal, and OpenAI is not?" (fosstodon.org)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

236 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You are missing his point. Is Disney going after the one who is selling the copy online, or are they going after Adobe?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In that analogy, openai is the one selling it, because their the ones using it to prop up their product.

I didn't think I needed to explicitly state that, but well, here we are.

Have a nice life tho. I'm over accounts that stop replying to one thread of replies and then just go and reply to one of my other comments asking me to explain what I've already told them.

Waaaay easier to just never see replies from that account

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some of us have to work for a living, I can't reply to every comment the moment it comes in and it seems rude to break the chaine.

In his analogy, openais product was the tool. You can do the same with both img gen and Photoshop, and neither of these prop up their product by implying it's easy to copyright infringe. That's why I said you were missing his point but you do you buddy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That guy is total loss, a tragic clown as i am not sure if i should cry or laugh about them. I am not sure what businesses they had in this argument at all except pissing off people who are better informed.

I've only just saw the comment where he seemed to suggest that the final trained model contains all trained materials in full.... and that combined with not once but multiple times pretending they know all about llm's that foss ai doesnt exist and we its we that all dont know how any of this tech works... i seriously have to restrain myself to leave that gross misconception as it is as i don't want them to respond. I hope the down-votes do their job.

I am sorry to vent, kinda just had to :)