Technology

59148 readers

2261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

335

Microsoft, OpenAI sued for copyright infringement by nonfiction book authors in class action claim (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Microsoft, OpenAI sued for copyright infringement by nonfiction book authors in class action claim::The new copyright infringement lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI comes a week after The New York Times filed a similar complaint in New York.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Personally, I think public info is fair game - consent or not, it's public. They're not sharing the source material, and the goal was never plagiarism. There was a period where it became coherent enough to get very close to plagiarism, but it's been moving past that phase very quickly

Microsoft, especially with how they scraped private GitHub repos (and the things I'm sure Google and Facebook just haven't gotten caught doing with private data) is way over the line for me. But I see that more as being bad stewards of private data - they shouldn't be looking at it, their AI shouldn't be looking at it, the public shouldn't be able to see it, and they probably failed on all counts

Granted, I think copyright is a bullshit system. Normal people don't get any protection, because you need to pay to play. Being unable to defend it means you lose it, and in most situations you're going to spend way more on legal costs than you could possibly get back.

I also think the most important thing is that this tech is spread everywhere, because we can't have one group in charge of the miracle technology... It's too powerful.

Google has all the data they could need, they've bullied the web into submission... They don't have to worry about copyright, they control the largest ad network and dominate search (at least for now).

It sucks that you can take any artist's visual work, and fine tune a network to replicate endless rough facsimile in a few days. I genuinely get how that must feel violating.

But they're going to be screwed when the corporate work dries up for a much cheaper option, and they're going to have to deal with the flood of AI work... Copyright won't help them, it's too late for it to even slow it down

If companies did something wrong, have it out in court. My concern is that they're going to pass laws on this that claim it's for the artists, but effectively gatekeep AI to tech giants