this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
159 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
5229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
159
US commits to landing an international astronaut on the Moon - This decade (arstechnica.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

US commits to landing an international astronaut on the Moon - This decade::This ticket to the Moon will probably go to a European or Japanese astronaut.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why is it that in your world NASA and the military are in no way linked? I've worked in defense procurement. Literally every time you mention defense procurement the core technologies were developed through NASA contracts and proof of concepts.

The reason I'm not sending you proof is because you aren't worth the time. These things are a matter of public record. You are so far off base that there is literally nothing I can send you that will pull your head out of the sand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Literally every time you mention defense procurement

LMFAO, what a small world! I did to... for years.

The reason I’m not sending you proof is because you aren’t worth the time.

And yet I was worth the time for the hours you read and responded before? Nah, don't buy it. You just don't have actual evidence. Like I said, you could have skipped all of this nonsense by supply anything that positively links NASA to any of this. But you didn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I literally don't believe that you ever were involved in any level of requirements analysis or weapons programs.