this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
165 points (97.7% liked)

Android

27558 readers
119 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is everyone just using AI and not proof reading? I see this a lot lately. Even Tom's Guide has bad editing, a good example is this article: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/pixel-8

Most notably, the display looks set to shrink from 6.3 inches to 5.8 inches

Then

The Pixel 8's screen is rumored to measure 6.17 inches, down from 6.31 inches.

It's like they're just grabbing from other articles and cramming together or adding content to old news now vs analyzing and forming opinions. With all the LMG drama lately, I had hoped written news would take note. Maybe I'm just too picky.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You realise their funding has been cut repeatedly since 2010? 1bn £ a year from 2017 to 2022.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This decline started long before 2017, but that's not even what we're discussing. If funding is being cut, all that does is shift some of the blame.

But who was at fault wasn't the topic of discussion. The fact is standards are dropping and it's noticeable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I mentioned "since 2010", I gave some numbers I could find without wasting the time to find all cuts since 2010.

That's exactly what we're discussing, media budgets going down affects the quality of the work the employees can do and the quality and quantity of employees they can hire.

Radio-Canada used to have their own journalists everywhere in the world, now they have a couple here and there and resort to using contractors when required, why? Their budget got dilapidated.

All medias use articles from the Associated Press more and more because it's cheaper than having their own journalists.

Cost cutting measures are taken all over the place. Add the fact that people don't read the articles anymore because they barely spend enough time on the page to read the title (if they don't just check it from the Google result of from their Facebook feed), the fact that people turn to "alternative journalists" who don't have any ethics code or quality standards plus the people who don't read at all and just check YouTube videos instead... The only way to get their attention isn't with facts but with sensationalism and the only way to increase their budget is by getting clicks and that happens by catching people's attention, not by reporting facts and not by releasing few high quality articles late after the fact. Readers want the news now, as it happens, no time for fact checks or corrections!

No wonder there's a media crisis that affects all serious medias, the way they traditionally did there job would lead to their death today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No wonder there’s a media crisis that affects all serious medias, the way they traditionally did there job would lead to their death today.

This we can agree on. But the point isn't so much why, I can't do much more than pay what I always did for the BBC. It's more just the annoyance that what used to be a great institution (some will argue) has been run into the ground this way.

It's probably the same with the degradation of most services now. The race to the bottom is the result of the average person always buying the cheapest option.

The full service airlines for short haul are mostly now offering the same services as low cost for example.

It's a strange time we live in, at least from my point of view.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well for media funded by the state we at least have the power to vote for parties that don't want to defund them, so that's that. For private media, well, they'll always thrive to make more profit so yeah, race to the bottom 🤷