this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
483 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7033 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bruh, are you really going to prioritize a singular type of hobby photography over access to a vital service such as the internet for millions of people? That's prime NIMBYism.

They've done plenty to help mitigate issues with terrestrial observatories. You could just as easily argue their rocketry advancements have made space much more accessible for the human race, which offsets any remaining harm to research telescopes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, I think millions of people around the world shouldn't have their access to a public good limited by the decisions of two billionaires from one country. I don't think that's a particularly strange take?

If there are going to be tens of thousands of satellites fucking up everyone's views of the sky, that should be at least be done with some attempt to gain a social licence first.