this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1571 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how that's going to play out with Apple and their monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A lot of this case hinged on the fact that Google wasn’t treating everyone the same. They had a lot of private details for big companies.

Unless Apple also has secret deals, then this isn’t going to impact them.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 11 months ago

Unless Apple also has secret deals

Apple doesn't need to make any deals at all because you simply can't install any other app stores, or any apps outside of the Apple app store.

That's the crazy thing, that they lost their case and Apple won, despite Apple having WAY more control.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Apple wouldn't need to have secret deals. They're running a walled garden over there. You can't side load, and you can't run payments through the app without Apple's approval. That case was about Apple forcing developers not to even talk in the app about the possibility of making a purchase elsewhere, like through their websites. It wasn't a deal, it was Apple strong-arming a developer because they could.

The problem is Google wanted to have what Apple has: a closed ecosystem they can exploit. But they don't have that, at least not to the same degree. Android is not "theirs", even if they've increasingly managed to make the Play Store more inseparable as time has gone by, and getting worse about that all the time.

The most they can do is scare people away from using third party app stores or doing anything with Android they don't approve of, and when it comes to things like Play Integrity and Play Protection, they can punish you for stepping outside their bounds by breaking certain functionality (for having the audacity to want to control your own device).

But they can't outright control anything.

Which is where the deals come in. They're making shady deals to keep Android as their money maker and no one elses.

It's anti-competitive, because to spite Google's efforts, there is an actual opportunity for competition on Android, where as on iPhone, there isn't.