this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
1745 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3794 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1745
Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing" (pluralistic.net)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
497 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Whether I'm pirating or buying a TV show, the actors were already compensated for their time

And where do you think that money comes from...?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

It just magically appears /s Its disingenuous to try and justify piracy on the basis that the performers have already been paid. I don't agree with studios either of course, customers are being scammed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From the investors who are paying the cheques of course. They are corporations, they can afford to spend some coins on [checks notes] living wages.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly it. Investors. They are not donations. They expect a return on their investments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And such "return" comes after the work, not before. So there's no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people. Now that would be air-quotes "stealing"!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And such "return" comes after the work

And once again, where do you suppose it comes from?

So there's no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people.

How does one "condition wages"?

Is your argument simply that theft is a-ok 👌 when the person you're stealing from is wealthy?