this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
627 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
2924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change::The USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change - US President Joe Biden announced in a speech on December 9, 2023 that they are carrying out the first high-speed train projects in US history. These projects are across America

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Amtrak is still a thing for passenger trains. It's just that it's slower than flying and just as expensive.

https://www.amtrak.com

Flew my wife to L.A. for her birthday, easy peasy. Couple of hours by plane.

Amtrak?

Fastest is 26 hours and 13 minutes for $230 coach tickets. Private room for $580.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Amtrak is still a thing for passenger trains. It’s just that it’s slower than flying and just as expensive.

This is the core reason passenger rail has not become dominant in the US. The country is so physically large that planes do passenger rail's job, but faster and at the same price point.

Instead, rail in the US is almost entirely bulk cargo as that makes a ton of sense. Cargo trains are cheaper than trucks/aircraft and the slower speed can be easily planned for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not just slower than flying, it's slower than driving in most cases.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I just punched in a random 7 hour drive in the US. Amtrak would take 16 hours and cost 3x as much as one would spend in gas to take oneself and their SO on a trip. This isn't even accounting for costs and time associated with getting to/from the station; whereas the car is door-to-door, faster, and cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the LA flight I used as an example is 20 hours by car, I've done it, can't say I'd do it again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Acela is useful. We have one intercity rail line that is useful, has high ridership, is profitable, people choose to use, arguably faster than driving or flying, demand far outstrips supply. also the fastest but it’s not really fast enough to be called “high speed”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

My parents once bought a private room on Amtrak. When they were shown to it, they literally thought it was a closet to store their bags not their room.