this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
169 points (96.2% liked)

Privacy

32442 readers
931 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As usual the blockchain really adds nothing to your proposal. Just allow people to host it on a random web server, there is no reason to have a centralized component at all for this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • Publishing. Forcing people to use web servers comlicates it for non-techies, or centralizes control.
  • Lookup. Having data scattered aroud the web makes lookup hard, or (again) centralizes control.
  • Cryptographically verifiable auditability.

Do you understand how blockchains work? I ask to gauge whether you have technical solutions for the problems blockchains solve, or are repeating criticisms of cryptocurrency you've read online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I understand how blockchains work and that is exactly why I know that they never add anything. They literally solve no problem.

Blockchains only really "work" if they are part of a community so huge that nobody external can easily add 50%+1 nodes to the network or so useless that nobody would want to spend the money on that. But if you have huge blockchains they are totally impractical to store on every single device which wants to interact with them. Add to that the extremely long delay before anything is added to the blockchain and you can be sure that the longest surviving chain actually includes that block and the (with proof of work) huge waste of energy or (with proof of stake) bias towards people who already have a stake in the chain and you will quickly figure out that blockchain is never the best and in many cases not even any solution. Not to mention how many blockchain proponents think data written to the blockchain magically solves the problem that you need to verify that the data you write to the blockchain is actually accurate (e.g. with all those proposals to use it for proof of origins of products and similar things).

There is a reason all the major blockchains actually in use soon add a layer of services that interact with the blockchain for you and then actually doesn't interact for every transaction. They are all working around the inherent flaws in the technology.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

What you're describing is a public ledger, and specifically how Bitcoin and Bitcoin-like, works; you aren't describing limitations of blockchain. Check out AWS's qldb for a non-cryptocoin blockchain db. Now, describe an implementation (in non-technical terms, if desired) that provides the features but that isn't a blockchain.