this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
111 points (86.3% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2773 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, are you saying that anyone who makes anything should be allowed to sell what they make and anyone should be allowed to share it for free?

Precisely. I do not believe that treating intangible things like expressions or ideas as "property" is beneficial to humanity as a whole.

Or do you just think there is nothing special about AI art and all of everyone’s work should be in the public domain?

This. I do not support copyrights. They are a blight on human creativity since the first moment they were put into enforcement and all they did is make non-artistic middlemen rich.

All these problems we have now, is because we are trying to shoehorn a 100+ year old legal framework, created when people didn't even consider something like the internet might exist, to generative AI. This won't work. It will only be used to screw the poor even worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Very interesting take, I was mistakenly under the impression that you thought that AI derived artwork should be treated differently than something made by a human creator.