this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
32 points (97.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40696 readers
320 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am wanting to self host a fediverse instance. I don't hope to make it big. Hoping for 200 users at most, and I won't advertise it heavily so it'll probably be a while before it gets there.

Is it a bad idea to host something like this on local hardware at home? I have a lot of local-only self hosted services, and I wouldn't want those to be compromised.

But my biggest fear is overloading my network. I already don't get the fastest signal in some parts of my house, and I am worried the extra traffic might put more pressure on the network.

What are your thoughts on hosting local? Should I just avoid the headache and host on public instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I understand this policy of needing to report them to official authorities is a new thing they now added out of fear of losing their grip of control on social media when people swarm to private instances.

My standards however will always remain on "No government has any business in private stuff." Just like everybody follows default trafficlaws on private parkings, but in reality they are just rules of the owner and unless you do damage the police can't do anything for driving wrongly on them. Same goes inside a store. Government has no say in how internals are handled and will only be allowed to note damage and allow the owner to press charges, if they so chose. I'm just drawing that basic right further to everything, including any privately setup software.

I kinda also feel that if I have to go and involve government authorities, it takes away a large basic reason to even go private. I'm not paying servercosts to still having to deal with government [insert bad word here]...

Governments can suck it and I'll just deal with my own issues. There is absolutely no way in hell I'm going to voluntarily contact any government [insert different bad word here] for things I am doing in private. They can go stand on their heads for all I care...

NB: This is in no way an attack towards you or what you commented, voting it up even cause you were very helpful and I do agree in general it's best to give the legals and leave it up to people to choose to follow that or not, I just needed to get this frustration about government control in private setups off my chest... 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My standards however will always remain on “No government has any business in private stuff.”

I never thought I’d see someone openly admit, even advocate, that they’re willing to host child sexual assault material on hardware they own. That’s a sad hill to die on.

I don’t really care about anything else you’ve written to justify your blanket standards either. All it takes is one example (CSAM) to show the depravity of your standards.

I’m all about privacy, even so far as to emigrate from the US to a country in the EU for privacy. But I have compassion and empathy and am also aware of ethical behavior, morality, and decency.

Privacy is not more valuable than protecting innocent human lives. If you can’t see that, you are lost. I’m sorry.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I agree, yet privacy is still more important than people watching media they didn't make. I advocate any and all people making those should be our target, not senselessly give up rights so we can punish those that didn't hurt anyone. And I just don't believe in the current legal system and allowing people that unpunished do attrocities to deal with other people doing them does not form an ok with me. 🤷‍♂️

You are literally going to idiots that don't solve the problem and are proven to do similar bad things themselves, who are using offense towards the people so attention diverts away from them, and you are arguing to 'me' that I don't want to do the same stupidity...? 🤷‍♂️

Go take a better look at your own actions, dude...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also if somebody films a murder, do we punish everybody that wants to see the video? No.

Then why are we punishing people that just watch it while not solving anything on those making them? 🤷‍♂️

Logic is a thing people apparently give up for authority. Not me though. Someone that wants to watch CSAM is not your business, just like it isn't if they watch murder, space stuff of baby cats... (And no, I don't think they are the same. Taking that from this would just be not wanting to think logic to make another inconsistent counter-attack, so please, don't.)

The harm with CSAM is already done and you're taking it out on the wrong persons with help of even worse people, wasting time on targets for what they might do instead of using it on people who actually did/do the bad things creating them.

Good job... Meanwhile I'll continue to focus on people that actually did something wrong...