this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
702 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
59207 readers
2845 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reading comprehension skills are lacking I see
The comment I was replying to was saying that electric vehicles are not viable and instead we should move away from private vehicle ownership. I was responding by pointing out why we still need private vehicle ownership.
I didn't make a comment about the method of proportion those private vehicles use.
The comment you replied to didn't say anything of the sort, though I understand you interpreted it in that way.
It literally says that, it literally says people shouldn't be taking their car to work with them. How else am I supposed to interpret it?
Smaller vehicles will likely be a lot more viable for most of us, rather than an expensive electric car.
Electric bikes, for example. Certainly on a "last few miles" basis. If you live further than that, then public transport will end up being the bulk of it.
Public transport should be heavily subsidised.
Maybe the prices of electric cars will come down to acceptable levels, but I suspect that there's a layer of people who could just about afford to keep a 10 year-old petrol banger on the road, who won't have that option under electric vehicles. Something needs to be provided and quickly.
It literally says "Or people need to give up the idea of taking three tons of metal to work with them every day."
You said:
Funnily enough, NONE of the words in your interpretation of their comment are in the original, not even the articles or connective words (what are even the odds that two sentences of more than 15 words not sharing at least ONE word?). The good-faith interpretation (the one they provided to this comment) would be they were advocating for subsidizing more public transport and increasing the usage of cheaper and smaller personal electric bikes, or cheaper and smaller cars in general.
Instead, you went with 'this person is scolding me for my car', and wrote an ironic comment placing the call to action on companies relocating to public transportation hubs and controlling the fucking weather, before which you would even engage in a conversation - presumably a conversation about 'giving up the idea of taking three tons of metal to work with you every day', but I'll admit I don't know.
Seems to me like you took the comment as a personal attack on your decision to own a car, but I think @[email protected] would put the call to action on subsidizing public transportation and designing more walk-able and bike-friendly cities.
Nobody can help you if you're afraid of the weather though.