this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
76 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7834 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't understand why it took us 50 years to figure out how to do encrypted messaging-over-email. Anyone wanna swap email addresses?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why send messages (encrypted or not) across multiple providers that get to see who you are communicating with, when you are communicating, and how often you are communicating? (i.e. why not just use a dedicated messaging app that we know doesn’t suck?)

who do you KNOW doesn't suck? myself, i like disroot, but i still prefer to encrypt any comms that go across their services, because i can't explicitly trust them. i don't even (really) trust riseup.net. it's always best to encrypt anything thats sensitive yourself and control the keys.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

i think it's worth pointing out that pgp-protected messages would still be secure in the case of the kolektiva breach, not that anyone is e2ee for mastodon messages.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

if you (and your friends) control your (and their) keys, then the actual contents of your communications can't be compromised. i think email is fine if you understand the limitations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i would never bother with anything that i consider to be highly secure over any clearnet service. but for keeping advertisers out of my messages or just run of the mill dragnets, or spot-censorship (like how facebook or others forbid certain links), i think deltachat is a really reasonable solution.

but to this point:

, it is inadvisable for privacy to keep data (even in an encrypted form) on a server post delivery.

deltachat has an option to delete server-side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you're asking more than i really know here. i haven't even convinced any of my friends to use it. it was hard enough getting their email addresses lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

this is my settings screen. it looks like you would need to actually ask your friends to turn on the server-side purging.