this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
776 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
960 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

It’s not some conspiracy, if you are at a 50/50 win rate, that means you are at the appropriate skill level. If you’re better you would have more wins and you’ll move up the ranking until you start losing more games, where you will fall down the rankings to where your average is.

It’s skill based ranking after all, some people have good days where they are better and some also have bad days. It all averages out, but 50/50 win rate means you are appropriately ranked.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's very easy to think how striving for 50/50 in all cases is a good and even desirable solution, but that's not how matchmaking is built in modern games because it would make for pretty bad experiences

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

That is how they are built, and how does everyone having as even of a chance as possible make for a bad experience?

Putting a bias like the parent comment is claiming is what will make the experience bad. Yeah you’ll get grumpy that you get paired with someone who has no defence, but they are also paired with you for a reason, they are a liability in other places.

I find the people that complain it’s a bad experience are the ones that are the most sore about a loss, they are the ones that just want to steam roll everyone so they can have fun while causing others peoples experiences to be diminished so they can be the ones having fun. Don’t be this person.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah. Well, I've made several and seen more in my career.

They don't aim for 50/50. Apart from normal elo systems, some things we work with is streaks, ping, class or roles, team width and other things that I probably should not mention.

The goal is to drive engagement, not 50/50 win rates. You just have no idea what you're talking about. But that's okay, just don't use such sure language when you haven't worked with matchmaking systems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Which ones have you made? I’m guessing they are ones that crashed and burned, or you’re making it up. The post is dead no one is seeing your lies but me. So save it lmfao. The fact that you claim it’s multiple is even more damning, it means that they aren’t working and you need to pump another out. Maybe if you only claimed to have worked on a single one they lie would be slightly more believable…..

They are setup to be 50/50, you lying about stuff doesn’t change that. And if you are biasing you match making, maybe, just maybe that’s why your games are crashing and burning…….

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You are wrong

Very embarrassing and probably why you will never make games is your choice to be close minded

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, very thought out rebuttal….

Again, no one else is seeing this BS but me, so just save the obvious lies for someone gullible mate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are very wrong in your assumptions, but you will never change and never make games. It is as fun as you think, but you must be able to challenge your assumptions and you are obviously not mature enough yet

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Lmfao, why would I want to make games? Let alone ones that’s crash and burn and have biased matchmaking lmfao.

Do you really think you have the moral to insult others in this situation? Lmfao.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)