this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1329 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
59421 readers
3619 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ubisoft did one good thing in my book: Rayman. That's it.
You mean the old game when Ubisoft use to be a name to respect? In the era when Activision and Interplay were some of the best development companies and had awesome games instead of ruining franchises. Yeah sure. Rayman was cool.
Ubisoft made splinter cell, farcry 2, ghost recon, and rocksmith. They did a lot of good things over the years. Problem is, they've changed.
They made a lot of good games back in the day.
Ubisoft used to be known for their quality, and they still have a lot of very talented developers under their belt.
The problem, as usual, is management and players with low standards.
The talented developers don't get to do more because players are willing to accept less. So that's what management tells them to do.
The key is to have higher standards, but nobody wants to admit they got suckered into buying or liking shit.
Anno, Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Asscreed Black Flag, Far Cry 3.
None even remotely interests me.