this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
154 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
59421 readers
3944 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe this is the paper this article is referencing from UCLA.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36056-4
Not specifically. The article references a paper in Science: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo4297. I haven't been able to find a publically available version of the Science paper.
The device in the Nature article is very large, "centimetre-scale", and works via magnetism. It is also not really controllable, as it responds to change in temperature. The Science article device is electronically controlled.
This might be in reference to the kind of device in the Nature article, however it does not directly cite the other article.