this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
201 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2296 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A fuel that is notoriously hard to contain and usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity.

Anyway, the commenter you're replying to is more referring to the pollution from tires and the noise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the death. Don’t forget the animal and human cost of everyone having a car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The animals and people killed by vehicles. The environmental impact those animal deaths can have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity

Well, it's either one or the another. While the energy loss is relatively high when using electricity, it's not a problem when you have an oversupply of renewable energy, actually it's even beneficial as it provides a storage for otherwise lost energy.
But regardless of the production, it generates no pollution when consumed by a vehicle. You know, like clean air in cities.

And of course, hydrogen won't solve tire pollution nor associated noise (albeit I guess it should be more silent that fossil fuel one) but it's still environmental friendly compared to what we have now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sprawl itself is also pretty terrible for the environment.

And it's hard to build sprawling towns that don't rely on cars, and hard to build dense towns where everyone drives everywhere.