this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
199 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
2939 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As dawn breaks over Silicon Valley, the world is getting its first look at Pathfinder 1, a prototype electric airship that its maker LTA Research hopes will kickstart a new era in climate-friendly air travel, and accelerate the humanitarian work of its funder, Google co-founder Sergey Brin.

The airship — its snow-white steampunk profile visible from the busy 101 highway — has taken drone technology such as fly-by-wire controls, electric motors and lidar sensing, and supersized them to something longer than three Boeing 737s, potentially able to carry tons of cargo over many hundreds of miles.

This morning, the airship floated silently from its WW2-era hangar at NASA’s Moffett Field at walking pace, steered by ropes held by dozens of the company’s engineers, technicians and ground crew.

The first lesson its engineers hope to learn is how Pathfinder 1’s approximately one million cubic feet of helium and weather resistant polymer skin will respond to the warming effect of Californian sunshine.

At the start of September, the FAA issued a special airworthiness certificate for the Pathfinder 1 allowing test flights in and around Moffett Field and the nearby Palo Alto airport, and over the southern part of the San Francisco Bay.

That will involve a long, slow slog to validate the new technologies and to demonstrate, to the FAA and paying customers, that a new generation of super-large airships can match the generally excellent safety and reliability record of today’s commercial jets.


The original article contains 1,145 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Airship, tons of cargo? They famously suck at carrying anything of weight. The hindenburg could carry like 10 tons, and a regular zeppelin around 2 tons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Helium isn’t exactly an abundant resource either, is it? I’m all for a future with a sky dotted with airships, but how could you possibly scale this up?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it was an abundant resource just not here, awkward places like the moon and sun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man I can't wait till we're able to harvest helium from the Sun! That means that we made to the big leagues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dyson sphere or ring world which do like better?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dyson Swarm. Makes more sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's expensive as shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hydrogen has about half the density of helium. The fire risk is notoriously unpopular, however.

Wide-spread adoption of airships would almost certainly have to use hydrogen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article says it can carry about 4 tons of cargo on top of the requirements to run the thing, but that's for Pathfinder 1. I'm trying to think of an actual real world use case for these. Outside of tours that carry around 50 adult passengers with no belongings, I don't see the practicality of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s completely impractical, which is why they’ll inevitably transition to luxury travel for millionaires. It’s faster than a yacht, but slower than a private jet, so it’s only useful roll is in carrying rich bastards to vacations that they aren’t in a rush to get to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The equivalent of a cruise ship, that's really the only market. Except with a much lower passenger count and a lot less space, so a much higher ticket price.

Maybe a luxury air yacht for the ultra-wealthy who're bored with their ocean yachts?