this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
557 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
2613 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

In his book, he charts the course of human history and tries to predict where it will end up. He comes to the conclusion that a violent revolution will soon come to pass as the workers overthrow their bosses and start sharing resources.

"Soon come to pass" was 150 years ago, the Revolution hasn't happened. Marxist scholars since then have been recreating the letters between early Christians asking why He hadn't returned yet as promised and pushing the date of the Second Coming back.

In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

There hasn't been any anti-capitalist revolutions in the last 150 year.

Maybe read a history book?

I seems to recall the US losing a war to communists in the 1970s for instance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

any

I don't think their point was that no revolution has happened but the revolution to change it all didn't happen like he assumed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Marx didn't consider capitalists holding the world hostage with nuclear weapons

plenty of successful revolutions did occur though, just not in places under the control of the 'west'

very chauvinistic view to hold IMO

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I mean the world revolution was already sorta stopped before nukes came into play. Maybe next time though, never say never

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)