this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
663 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon execs destroyed years of evidence before FTC action, agency says::Amazon allegedly destroyed communications, turned controversial programs on and off, and knowingly raised prices for consumers, according to unsealed documents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Split Amazon into retail and web services and then further split them into multiple different companies. Amazon has gotten way too big and stifling competition along the way.

Do the same to Facebook too while we're at it. Fucking hate speech central.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Amazon, meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Even though I'm not a fan of Apple, I am not sure how it could be split. Unlike other companies mentioned, Apple is firmly in consumer electronics business, except for Apple TV+ which is a recent addition.

Their software products also exist to work only on specific hardware.

Also, only today I figured out that they have their own office suite lol. Don't know why I never thought about it before

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are heavily vertically integrated, even if split, they'd still work together as one company, because they simply don't have any other choice.

There are many products all of these companies have that aren't profitable (f.e. YouTube would either die or get enshitified to hell, can't see Prime Music surviving without the rest of the Prime ecosystem etc.).

Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are many products all of these companies have that aren't profitable

Splitting most of these up would not help anyone.

Good.

Companies have been using their profitable ventures to get dominant (or even solo) position in another market segment by undercutting the competition and then degrade their services as there's no other alternative for customers.

This should force them (and customers) to reconsider their offerings and the pricing for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone is complaining about services raising prices all the time. YouTube introducing anti-adblock tech has caused an uproar.

Do you know why YouTube is dominant? It's because it's subsidized. Running a service like that is more expensive than you could ever imagine and it's free, thanks to subsidization.

I'm not saying Google's a good company, but consider how much value YouTube has brought into the world - it's not only entertainment, but also education.

It wouldn't survive on it's own.

Splitting up companies makes no sense. They could (and in 99% of cases still would) work together as one. Regulating them and holding them accountable does, much more. Why not start there, instead of wasting your time here?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's one of the issues with these business models, it's hard to give a consumer something and then take it away later to turn a profit (enshittification).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that instead of allowing companies to enshitiffy, we just kill all of them instantly?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because it's subsidized.

Do you know why google is ad monopoly? Because they have all youtube info.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's no way that's true. It's a piece of it for sure, but they are neither an ad monopoly or a monopoly dependent on YouTube info.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their streaming. Also split software development and hardware development.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they only develop software for their hardware. Even after splitting, the Apple Software will only have one customer: Apple Hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But Apple Hardware will have multiple suppliers

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alpha, beta, GAMMA

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They (technically) already are. I work for Amazon, but I don't get paid by "Amazon". I get paid for the subsidiary I work for.

Splitting is fine, but it's easily dealt with by megacorps. If anything, if the idea is floated, it's probably because they're absolutely fine with it.

If you want to break Amazon apart, do the one thing they hate. Enable their employees to unionize, and empower them to fight the decades-long HR machine that ruins corporate employees lives.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The moment you seperate AWS from the rest, the rest will shut down.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

If Amazon (retail) can't survive on it's own without exploiting workers and all the other crap they do, then we'll be better off without it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I'm not just asking to separate AWS. I want AWS to further split into different companies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would you think that it isn't profitable?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because they sell the bulk of their products at a loss. They use their webservices platform to bankroll their retail platform so they can undersell even Walmart. Some years it does turn a slight profit but generally it's fairly negative but no matter what it doesn't offset the pure profit that is the web services division. https://ir.aboutamazon.com/quarterly-results/default.aspx

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Serious question, why do they then even bother with the retail platform?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

If I had to guess, to achieve the ultimate conclusion of the Walmart plan, squash every other retailer in the nation and then raise prices.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Brand awareness, data metrics, upselling their shitty amazon choice products.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Gotta go further and deeper then that too. There are other, larger and more diverse companies that are hiding in plain site behind the more popular business like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc...