this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
169 points (96.2% liked)

Privacy

32013 readers
1569 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, there's no such thing as breaking encryption, they're trying to outlaw, or require back doors for strong encryption. Outside of a quantum computing miracle expansion, there's no breaking strong encryption.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

require back doors for strong encryption

That's what the headline implies. Encryption is useless if a third party can decrypt it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His point, which seems pedantic, but isn’t, is to illustrate the specific attack vector.

Breaking encryption would mean that the cryptographic process is something that an attacker can directly exploit. This is as close to impossible as it gets in that line of work.

While you can compromise the effectiveness of encryption by subverting it using other attack vectors like man in the middle or phishing or the good old fashioned physical device access, these don’t break the algorithm used in a way that it makes it vulnerable to decrypting other data.

None of those mean an algorithm used like say the ole Two fish encryption is “broken”.

Blowfish Triple DES Twofish RC4 Etc. All are fine and not currently broken. All however cannot protect your data if some other attack vector companies you or your site’s security.