this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
310 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3566 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
310
A small UK software company which trademarked the name Threads over 10 years ago is demanding Meta stop using the name within 30 days (www.businessinsider.in)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A small UK software company which trademarked the name Threads over 10 years ago is demanding Meta stop using the name within 30 days::Threads Software Limited and its lawyers wrote to Meta to tell it to stop using the Threads name in the UK.It's owned the British trademark for Threads since

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It seems to me that there might be room for confusion and maybe they are closely enough related to cause a problem.

The British company trademarked Threads in 2012 for its intelligent messaging hub, which can store a company's emails, tweets, and voice over internet protocol phone calls in a cloud database.

"You can store your threads from Threads in Threads... Ummm... I mean, Threads Software Limited provides software that will let you store your threads from Threads..."

That said, I don't know if Threads Software Limited is actively used or abandoned IP. If their IP is in active use, not abandoned, they could have a case. It's likely a cash grab, though. They probably hope Facebook will just settle with them for a few million.