this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
204 points (91.1% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
968 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It's unlikely to have ever happened.

2^42 is 25 times the total number of people ever born in all of history.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Also, twins aren't identical copies either. Different fingerprint etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fingerprints aren't genetically coded, and clones wouldn't have the same fingerprints, either.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I typically associate "clone" with "an exact copy", with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The definition of "clone" you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)