this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
991 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1026 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 161 points 1 year ago (42 children)

Wait until you hear about languages where everything is gendered.

We're currently debating, whether BürgerInnen, Bürger:innen or "Bürgerinnen und Bürger" is the proper way to address all citizens. This is not even about anything LGBTQ, it's simply acknowledgement of the concept of non-male people (which is really hard for some conservatives).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I prefer the elimination of gender by using the participle because I think it’s easier to read and say, e.g. instead of Student:In you say Studierende (I guess also using the genderless plural of the participle, similar to the English concept). I’m not sure what the equivalent for Bürger would be though. Geborgene?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not just use the generic plural form (Bürger) as people always have? It has always been used for mixed groups so why shouldnt it continue to? And sometimes it doesnt even work (eg. for "Bauer". The plurals would be "Bauern" and "Bäuerinnen".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem people have with the Generischer Maskulinum is, that it is exactly that, the male plural form.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Grammatical genus is not the same as biological gender. Or do people that are biologically neither male nor female need a third plural form?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That would be another advantage if we had a form that clearly eliminates the gender.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)