this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
731 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32483 readers
614 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I disagree.

Be...before I go. Could you approve all my experimental PRs?

Real story, I have a branch that's been open for four years at my company to add support for nested postgres transactions. It works flawlessly... but we, the senior devs, are uncertain if it's a power that would be used responsibly by the juniors. If I'm going to walk into the light, I'm going to make sure there's a badass explosion behind me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've got one for a vscode feature (middle mouse click for go-to definition) that I want but the maintainers don't think it would be used.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm in the niche of niches by using vsc with a vim plugin while being a dvorak user. I rely on vim's langmap feature to get anywhere, but people implementing vim emulators blissfully ignore accessibility like that. So I went and implemented langmap in vsc's vim plugin myself. It has minimal intervention into the existing codebase and a bunch of other people have been wishing for this for years. Yet, when it comes to merging... Silence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Can't you just open source your fork? I mean yeah it does suck but still. I've been in the same place and it does suck when they won't take your PR.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I try to use middle click for definition in vscode so often because you can do that in jetbrains IDEs...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Give this PR some love then. It works and it's magical but they don't seem interested in merging it in. https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/pull/154465

load more comments (3 replies)