this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
316 points (92.2% liked)

Privacy

32456 readers
402 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Quick shout-out to Grayjay: An app to watch videos on any platform - reducing the power of individual services. The Software is open-source and can be found here: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

I will test this out for myself and hope someone here finds this useful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. Beware of the inevitable enshittification down the line. Once they have the market share, they have no reason not to close their source

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Futo (the organisation developing this app) appears to be a tech billionaire (Eron Wolf) firing his money at the tech industry until it stops being so shit.

This is from the about page on their website:

Our Three Pledges

We will never sell out. All FUTO companies and FUTO-funded projects are expected to remain fiercely independent. They will never exacerbate the monopoly problem by selling out to a monopolist.

We will never abuse our customers. All FUTO companies and FUTO-funded projects are expected to maintain an honest relationship with their customers. Revenue, if it exists, comes from customers paying directly for software and services. “The users are our product” revenue models are strictly prohibited.

We will always be transparently devoted to making delightful software. All FUTO-funded projects are expected to be open-source or develop a plan to eventually become so. No effort will ever be taken to hide from the people what their computers are doing, to limit how they use them, or to modify their behavior through their software.

(From: https://futo.org/what-is-futo/)

What they say and what they will do could of course differ but they do go to great pains to paint themselves as fundamentally opposed to be sort of action you are worried about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Words are cheap. Google used to write "don't be evil". If they are a billionaire, they could easily afford to make this FOSS.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I trust Louis Rossman not to do that. He explained the only reason for the current license is to prevent people forking the app and putting it on the Play store with ads

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I trust no one. Just put the code in a permissive license so when you eventually cease developing the app or when you turn into adding anti-features there are community forks.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He explained his reasoning in the video. He said a malicious copy of newpipe got forked and uploaded to the play store and he would like to prevent that from happening.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that's no excuse at all. This way they are restricting everyone's freedom.

Free software, or if you prefer, open source, is based on the principle that everyone can use the code for any purpose (some licenses have copyleft but that just requires you to share your modifications to the code).

A malicious actor will simply grab this app code anyway, don't giving a crap about the license and put ads on top. If they are a malicious actor after all, I highly doubt the license will stop them.

What the license is stopping are legitimate community forks. There's a fork of Newpipe that adds Sponsorblock support, for example, which comes super handy. If community forks weren't allowed, it wouldn't be possible at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Having a license allows them to go after the malicious actor with legal backing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

They should allow that. With gpl, the name is protected and that's all that matters.