this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1026 points (96.1% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1394 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The issue, which is obvious to most people that aren't Euro-American, is that if you view generations of colonial violence as a normal baseline, then calling for "both sides" to "stop fighting" whenever colonial subjects resist isn't actually calling for peace. It's calling for the colonized to submit and go back to being quietly exterminated in an orderly fashion so you can go back to not thinking about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Is conquest exclusive to euro-american history?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No but colonizing generally is.

With the exception of Japan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, really?

What about the middle eastern empires? Or the turks? Or the Aztecs?

Or literally any other force in history lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you reread they never said those nations didn’t engage in conquest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And they also settled and slaved on the annexed lands, thus engaging in colonization

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think all other borders were agreed upon via a nice arm wrestling match?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They already acknowledged that conquest isn’t exclusive to euro-American history so I’m not sure what point you think you’re making right now.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)